| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 |
61. Why isn't ore yield based on sec status? Maybe it should be.. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Clutch Cargo on 08/10/2005 16:56:35 No offense but this is a silly idea. Why would anyone go into 0.0 and mine veld? Barges would be useless because even protected they wouldn't last against the spawns. Factor in the lack of station...
- by Clutch Cargo - at 2005.10.08 16:53:00
|
62. Instas to be nerfed? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: Would make sense to me that if, even if there are no "guards", that the gate itself would have an auto-defense system that would be sensitive to any (new)hostile activity within an area around it.. self-preservation as it were. Ri...
- by Clutch Cargo - at 2005.10.04 20:18:00
|
63. Instas to be nerfed? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: i agree with this poster on this matter. instas shouldnt beable too be given from one player too another the maker should be the only one who can use them. Why? This would be almost as bad as removing them altogether. Other than...
- by Clutch Cargo - at 2005.10.03 23:36:00
|
64. Instas to be nerfed? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: This is the best idea I've seen on balancing instajumps yet. IMO it takes care of a bunch of problems in one solution. This adds another "randomness" factor to game; this is EVE, not poker. Personally I see ZERO problem with bookm...
- by Clutch Cargo - at 2005.10.03 20:04:00
|
65. Huge increase in macro mining. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: No. Because you can give someone ISK for no reason. I know of quite a few incidents in other games where people who knew they were going to be banned spreading their cash far and wide, and getting dozens of other people banned - none...
- by Clutch Cargo - at 2005.10.02 17:14:00
|
66. Huge increase in macro mining. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I have several things to say about this. The first, a loan system? Pfffh, please, this is a game and if you are that pathetic that you are not willing to play the game and understand that MMO's (and most games) are setup for you to start off as a...
- by Clutch Cargo - at 2005.10.02 15:58:00
|
67. Please Stop Reporting Me As A Macro - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I think all this misses the point. Macroers will ruin the game...period. I am not talking about "Joe Everyday Player" who might use a macro while he reads; I am talking about professional sweatshop macroers. This is becoming a huge problem in the...
- by Clutch Cargo - at 2005.09.24 21:00:00
|
68. Does anyone else feel......... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
"Greatness" From a form and function perspective I think the game is pretty close as far as MMO's go. From a "we need a gazillion subscribers" perspective, I hope it never gets there. I doubt the servers could handle it. When they broke 10K I r...
- by Clutch Cargo - at 2005.09.24 05:38:00
|
69. Help with T2 Building - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Edited by: Clutch Cargo on 21/09/2005 17:50:46 I am thinking about getting into building some T2 stuff. I have all necessary T1 skills maxxed but have no idea where to go from there. I know I need advanced science skills, but that is the exten...
- by Clutch Cargo - at 2005.09.21 17:34:00
|
70. Curious about your Screen Names meanings & how or why etcà you came up - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Named after a bizarre cartoon from when I was a kid. If you watched Pulp Fiction, it was the show on TV when young Butch got his dad's watch. The faces were static but the lips were real moving human lips. I figured the name was a good fit for an ...
- by Clutch Cargo - at 2005.09.21 06:34:00
|
71. The Alpha or The Omega of a macro mining operation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I left out a bunch of details in the original post because I was sortof making light of it. All those bestowers in one place was pretty unusual. So for those that want to ridicule me, here goes. There were 20+ people in the system. There were 2 ...
- by Clutch Cargo - at 2005.09.20 23:41:00
|
72. The Alpha or The Omega of a macro mining operation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: so mining with an indy is now "macromining" despite the fact that its done without macro's since the only thing needed is to change targets when the roid goes pop. way to go "hero" for uncovering this vast horendously evil plot to de...
- by Clutch Cargo - at 2005.09.20 21:34:00
|
73. The Alpha or The Omega of a macro mining operation - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I was flying through Seesha today and I noticed the tell tale signs of macro miners in the local chat box. Figuring I would do my civic duty, I detoured to the belts to see what I could see. There before me, like a swarm of flies and a pile of (yo...
- by Clutch Cargo - at 2005.09.20 20:00:00
|
74. Whats the plan to stop ore thieving? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Regarding Winterblink, it was an observation, not an attack. Quote: Clutch, these placement restrictions were not always there. They were introduced to remove some serious issues with cans, mining, noobs and even exploits. You may not like ...
- by Clutch Cargo - at 2005.09.20 16:13:00
|
75. Whats the plan to stop ore thieving? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Clutch Cargo on 20/09/2005 15:35:57 Quote: I think he meant me Winter. No I was talking about winterblink. I don't think his: Quote: Frankly, because nothing in EVE is supposed to be EASY. added a whole lot to ...
- by Clutch Cargo - at 2005.09.20 15:33:00
|
76. Whats the plan to stop ore thieving? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
When I first heard about criminal flagging of ore thieves I thought it was a good idea. Then I read the Crime and Punishment forum and quickly changed my mind. For the reason posted in an above reply, miners are just going to get spanked if crimi...
- by Clutch Cargo - at 2005.09.19 23:14:00
|
77. Whats the plan to stop ore thieving? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Clutch Cargo on 19/09/2005 22:09:50 Quote: Hey clutch probably not wise to annoy those BOB's and friends of BOB. Point taken, but I wasn't referring to the BOB posters I was referring to the guy who I quoted. There are sev...
- by Clutch Cargo - at 2005.09.19 22:08:00
|
78. Whats the plan to stop ore thieving? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: Frankly, because nothing in EVE is supposed to be EASY. Wow, in one sentence you managed to remove a need for the forums, customer service and petitions. I know there are several of you here that feel (maybe because you think th...
- by Clutch Cargo - at 2005.09.19 20:21:00
|
79. Whats the plan to stop ore thieving? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: eerh, isn't that obvious ? Yea, it's obvious. I simply do not understand WHY CCP wants to make mining so difficult. I find absolutely non-sequiter that you would have secure cans that don't even hold one cycle worth of ore? I kno...
- by Clutch Cargo - at 2005.09.19 17:54:00
|
80. Whats the plan to stop ore thieving? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Quote: The plan to stop ore thieving is already implemented, it's called secure containers. Yea these are awesome. They can't be anchored in .7 or up. They can't be anchored within 5k or anything and they hold less than 1 mining cycle of...
- by Clutch Cargo - at 2005.09.19 06:54:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |